VOLUME 2
ISSUE 6
Inside
This Issue
Education
Department Gives States Approval on Changes
2004
National Assessment of Educational Progress
The Returns of a
Community College Education
Teacher Quality Among Top
Priorities in Reauthorization of HEA
Quick
Links
State
by State...
This
Policy Brief is developed by the National
Center for Teacher Education of the Maricopa Community Colleges.
Please direct any comments or submissions to:
Dr. Cheri St.
Arnauld
Executive Director,
National Association of Community College Teacher Education Programs/
National Director of Teacher Education Programs
2411 W. 14th Street
Tempe, AZ 85281
Phone: 480.731.8760
Fax: 480.731.8786
NACCTEP is very
interested in your feedback and ideas! Please email
us with policy issues you would like to see discussed in future
briefs.
Volume 1, Issue 1
Volume 1, Issue
2
Volume 1, Issue 3
Special Edition
Policy Brief- Accreditation & Certification
Volume 1, Issue 5
Volume 1, Issue 6
Volume 1, Issue 7
Volume 1, Issue 8
Volume 2, Issue 4
Volume 2, Issue 5
Volume 2, Issue 6
|
WELCOME
Welcome
to the Policy Brief. The purpose of this brief is to provide
a
resource for teacher education professionals, administrators and
students from which teacher preparation, recruitment, retention and
renewal programs and policies can be developed. The choice of summaries
is not an attempt to promote any particular position on issues or
polarization of recommendations made by government and educational
officials or contributors of the publications.
Education
Department Gives States Approval on Changes
In mid-July, Federal officials sent decision letters to
16 states approving some of their requested changes to accountability
plans under the NCLB act. These changes should make it
easier for schools and districts to show progress. Another 31 states
are awaiting similar decisions, although many have received verbal
approvals or denials. The changes were due in part, by U.S. Secretary
of Education Margaret Spellings’ April 7 pledge to take a more “common
sense” approach to carrying out the law. The most commonly approved amendments are:
- Raising the
minimum subgroup size.
- Using a
confidence interval of 99 percent in calculating adequate yearly
progress.
- Using a
confidence interval of 75 percent under the law's "safe harbor"
provision, which provides a second look at schools and districts that
did not make AYP initially.
- Averaging
results across years.
- Identifying
districts for improvement only when they do not make AYP in the same
subject for two consecutive years in elementary, middle, and high
school.
- Revising annual
AYP targets to increase in 10 equal increments through 2014.
- Adjusting
upward the percent of proficient students with disabilities in schools
that failed to make AYP based solely on their special education
subgroup.
Read more here.
Source: Education Week [July 13, 2005]
BACK TO
TOP
2004 National
Assessment of Educational Progress
NAEP's 2004 Long Term Trends in Academic
Progress is now available online at www.nces.ed.gov. The National
Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), also known as "the Nation's
Report Card, is the only nationally representative and continuing
assessment of what America's students know and can do in various
subject areas. Since 1969, assessments have been conducted periodically
in reading, mathematics, science, writing, U.S. history, civics,
geography, and the arts.
Students were
measured at three ages: 9, 13 and 17. Major results indicate the
following:
- The average
reading scores of students at ages 9 and 13 were higher in 2004 than in
1971. There was no statistically significant difference between average
scores in 1999 and 2004 for 17 year olds.
- The average
mathematics scores of students at ages 9 and 13 were higher in 2004
than in 1973. The average score for 17 year olds in 2004 did not show a
significant change when compared to the score in either 1973 or 1999.
- At all three ages, female students
outperformed male students in reading.
- At all three ages, black students' average
reading scores in 2004 were higher than in 1971.
- At all three ages, Hispanic students'
average reading scores were higher in 2004 than in 1975.
- In 2004, male students scored higher than
female students in math scale scores only at ages 13 and 17. At age 9,
the apparent
difference was not statistically significant.
- At all three ages, the average mathematics
scale scores for black students were higher in 2004 than in 1973.
- At all three ages, hispanic students'
average scale scores in mathematics were higher in 2004 than in 1973.
Read
more of the report here.
Source:
National Center for Education Statistics [July 14, 2005]
BACK TO
TOP
The Returns of a Community College
Education
An article published in the Journal: Educational
Evaluation and Policy
Analysis, discusses the economic effects of a community college
education using the latest available nationally representative dataset.
The authors find substantial evidence that a community college
education has positive effects on earnings among young workers,
especially for those who earn an associate degree. This effect was
larger for annual earnings than for hourly wages. Earnings benefits
accrued both to those who failed to earn a credential and to those who
earned an associate degree. Using the 2000 follow-up of the National
Education Longitudinal Survey, the authors estimated earnings effects
of a community college education. Previous research relied on data
collected from students enrolled 20 or 30 years ago. Because the labor
market and community colleges have changed dramatically since then, the
authors provide an update by studying students enrolled in the 1990s.
Click here to read more.
Source:
Community College Research Center [July 2005]
BACK TO
TOP
Teacher Quality Among Top Priorities
in Reauthorization of Higher Education Act
As members of the 109th Congress work
toward reauthorization of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (HEA), their
attention seems trained on two priority areas: access and teacher
quality. Already several bills are circulating on Capitol Hill, some of
which have been introduced in the Senate or in the House of
Representatives.
Access
to Higher Education
The bills address access to higher education through loan regulations,
incentive grants, and other measures of mostly financial nature. New
proposals, for example, enhance incentives to enter the teaching
profession; expand Pell Grants and ease loan-refinancing restrictions;
amend loan-forgiveness programs for “highly qualified” Head Start
teachers; increase tuition waivers for future math, science, and
special education teachers; and institute grants to support
post-baccalaureate opportunities for Hispanic Americans, digital and
wireless technology systems at minority-serving institutions, and
similar programs.
Teacher Preparation,
Innovation, and Accountability
Several legislators and groups have also drafted bills to amend Title
II of HEA, which deals with teacher preparation. Program innovation and
accountability for student learning dominate most of the proposals. One
of the least popular results of the current law is the confusion
generated by variation in required teacher licensure tests and
acceptable scores from state to state. Without common standards across
states and institutions, meaningful comparison of programs has been
elusive. Proposed amendments to Title II attempt to rectify this
problem through strategies such as national benchmarking of scores.
The
American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education has also
contributed a proposal to
amend Title II. A summary of AACTE’s bill is posted at
http://www.aacte.org.
Click here to read more.
Reprinted
with Permission from AACTE; Briefs [June 6, 2005]
BACK TO
TOP
Public school
officials are trying to meet teacher-recruiting targets to fill
classrooms in high-growth and high-turnover areas. The issue: by the
end of the coming school year, the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) law
requires "highly qualified" teachers in all core academic classes. New
data show that one-fourth of Maryland's classes this year did not meet
that standard. That is an improvement over last year’s figure
of one-third of classes statewide falling short of the teacher quality
standard. Schools in
high-poverty neighborhoods were far less likely than those in affluent
communities to have highly qualified teachers. Teacher-quality rules
vary widely across the country, making interstate comparisons
difficult. In Virginia, the latest data show nearly 95 percent of
core academic classrooms in 2004 had highly qualified teachers. Read
more here.
Source: Washington Post
[July 10, 2005]
The U.S. Department of
Education will publish a common graduation rate for every state in an
attempt to provide a clearer picture of how successful the states are
in ensuring that
students complete high school. The department will
calculate each state's graduation rate based on the number of high
school graduates in a given year divided by the average of the number
of students who entered the 8th grade five years earlier, the 9th grade
four years earlier, and the 10th grade three years earlier. The
"averaged freshman graduation rate" will be published alongside the
graduation rates that states report under the federal No Child Left
Behind Act. Read
more here.
Source:
Education Week [July 14,
2005]
BACK TO
TOP
Utah Facing Teacher
Shortage
According to the Salt Lake Tribune, without the
legislature's help, Utah potentially faces a teacher shortage in coming
years. Educators have asked lawmakers to pay for several programs to
recruit, retain and train Utah teachers. In their annual report,
members of the state Board of Education and state Board of Regents said
Utah is losing 1,175 teachers a year. A projected increase in the
number of students combined with that attrition rate means the state
would have to fill approximately 80,000 teacher vacancies during the
next 20 years. Although educators say the teacher shortfall is
manageable now, according to the annual report, steps such as
increasing teacher salaries must be taken. Read more here.
Source:
The Salt Lake Tribune [July 26, 2005]
Connecticut
Governor Backs NCLB Lawsuit
Governor
M. Jodi Rell signed a law that authorizes Connecticut's lawsuit
challenging NCLB. Attorney General Richard Blumenthal plans to file the
lawsuit in August even though the State Board of Education has not
endorsed it. Connecticut
is one of many states that have clashed with the U.S. Department of
Education over No Child Left Behind. The federal government has
repeatedly rejected Connecticut's requests for flexibility in
interpreting the law, including Commissioner Sternberg's appeal for a
waiver of a requirement to test three additional grades in the state's
annual testing program next spring. Read more here.
ASCD Smart
Brief [July 26, 2005]
BACK TO
TOP
|