VOLUME 2
ISSUE 2
Inside
This Issue
No
Child Left Behind - Briefs pertaining to Acountability, Progress and
Teacher Quality
This
Policy Brief is developed by the National
Center for Teacher Education of the Maricopa Community Colleges.
Please direct any comments or submissions to:
Dr. Cheri St.
Arnauld
Executive Director,
National Association of Community College Teacher Education Programs/
National Director of Teacher Education Programs
2411 W. 14th Street
Tempe, AZ 85281
Phone: 480.731.8760
Fax: 480.731.8786
NACCTEP is very
interested in your feedback and ideas! Please email
us with policy issues you would like to see discussed in future
briefs.
Volume 1, Issue 1
Volume 1, Issue
2
Volume 1, Issue 3
Special Edition
Policy Brief
Volume 1, Issue 5
Volume 1, Issue 6
Volume 1, Issue 7
Volume 1, Issue 8
|
WELCOME
Welcome
to the Policy Brief. The purpose of this brief is to provide
a
resource for teacher education professionals, administrators and
students from which teacher preparation, recruitment, retention and
renewal programs and policies can be developed.
No Child Left
Behind – Briefs pertaining to Accountability, Progress and Teacher
Quality
The
following articles are intended to help educators better
understand how the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is affecting
schools, reshaping the teaching profession, and altering state
and federal education policies. The articles referenced here
demonstrate various positions in support of or against NCLB mandates.
Some offer recommendations to modify certain NCLB requirements. NACCTEP
presents these articles as information to its readers and makes no
attempt to promote any particular position on these issues.
Accountability:
NCLB is Pushing Schools in the Right Direction -
NCLB is solidifying Bush's position as the "Education President," but
the law does have its faults. One of its biggest flaws is an
accountability provision that has classified thousands of schools as
failing.
Accountability:
Discussion of the Effectiveness of the NCLB Policy
- W. James Popham writes, "Many U.S. educators now wonder whether
they're teachers or targets.” This mentality stems from the specter of
their schools being sanctioned for failing the state accountability
tests mandated under No Child Left Behind.
Accountability:
Improving Schools One Student at a Time - The NCLB
model for measuring adequate yearly progress is flawed, because it
identifies schools as successful or unsuccessful on the basis of the
percentage of students in each grade who have attained the minimum
"proficient" level. This ignores individual student progress for
students who perform far below or far above that level.
Progress:
Implementation of NCLB - A report from the Education
Commission of the States tracks how states are progressing on 40 NCLB
goals.
Progress:
Measured Progress-NCLB -This report by the Education
Trust documents that student achievement in reading and math is rising
in the elementary grades in most states and achievement gaps are
narrowing. In many places, however, the pace of these gains must
accelerate dramatically if all students are to meet state standards by
2014.
Teacher
Quality: Urgency in Pursuing "Highly Qualified" Goals - According
to a report by the National Council on Teacher Quality, most states are
doing a poor job of ensuring their teachers will meet NCLB's standard
for "highly qualified" by the end of the 2005-06 school year. The
report cited Colorado as the only state to require its teachers to
either pass a subject matter test or take coursework closely
approximating a college major. To view this page you must be a
registered user of edweek.org. Registration is free.
Teacher Quality:
What Matters Most – While national attention has been riveted on
the accountability provisions of NCLB, few in the education community
have focused on what matters most to ensure that all students make
adequate yearly progress—high-quality teachers. From the Capitol to the
classroom, much needs to be done to ensure that NCLB helps all students
have access to the knowledgeable teachers they need and deserve.
Teacher
Quality: Professional Development in Accountability Systems –
Although high-stakes accountability systems help focus professional
development efforts on the curricular needs of students, little
evidence exists to support the claim that such systems help teachers
change their practice to enhance student learning, according to a study
from the Southeast Center for Teaching Quality.
|